Tom Harris has a message for Alberta Premiere Allison Redford in his article: Smart messaging needed to avoid pipeline lobbying failure. Harris laments Alberta's Keystone pipeline messaging saying "a supposedly conservative government feeds the fire that threatens to destroy the province’s, and indeed the country’s, main source of wealth, their vast hydrocarbon resources" and of Allison Redford that "her approach is doomed to failure."
The article identifies Harris as the Executive Director of the International Climate Science Coalition, and an advisor to the Frontier Centre for Public Policy. He's put together an excellent well reasoned video you can watch below.
(h/t WUWT)
What's wrong with preaching nonsense to the nonsensical? Why not serve gobbleygook to the gook gobblers? Well because its a waste of time.
Pandering to the ridiculous only reinforces it. It's better to appeal to higher reasoning than to stoop to the level of sloganeering battles. They sloganeer to appeal to the ignorant in the first place. The antidote to ignorance is clarity on reality, not learning to speak the mongrel noises of the irrational eco-nut.
By trying to appease climate alarmists and using their own nonsensical and incorrect language in a vain effort to win them over Redford is conceding victory. They don't have a rational reason to oppose Keystone. Its pure symbolism. Keystone is a proxy for their larger war. They don't care if Keystone is better for the environment. They care about scoring a victory against "big oil." There is no circumstance where the success of the pipeline will include the symbolic victory they seek.
Eco-nuts are the enemy.
I make a distinction against Eco-nuts and people like us who love the environment. You can't call yourself Canadian and not be in love with this beautiful land. We are people who respect the land and work hard in our responsible and bountiful economy. We are the target audience and we share these values with Americans.
Eco-nuts are lost. There is nothing we can say to sway them. Perhaps losing their illogical Keystone battle is the first step to their rediscovery of reason but that is a path they have to walk themselves. Approving Keystone will help the average person and that is who we need to be speaking to.
Allison Redford will be speaking to the anti-Keystone Brookings Institute in Washington next week. It will be live streamed but you have to register.
Whatever happens to Keystone will have major political and economic repercussions in Alberta, Canada and the United States.
Showing posts with label eco-nut. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eco-nut. Show all posts
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Misanthropy in Environmentalism
Misanthropy: a hatred of the human race.
Try that word out. Its here. Its inside the environmental movement and its dangerous to our health.
Last weekend the misanthropic eco-nut cult held a Blackout Rally in Washington. Only 5,000 people showed up. One of them was honest enough to speak his mind to the Light Brigade.
This man wants blackouts. He wants to get rid of all the roads and all the cars because he thinks they are an existential threat to the planet. The planet and our civilization cannot co-exist in the minds of many environmentalists.
Not all of them are like that. The groupies who haven't really thought it through are in there too. A great many have picked up the misanthropic ques from the leaders and are actively against the human race.
The guy in the video above is not some freak that just showed up. He is typical. I've met people like him and debated them.
Usually it starts when someone you just met says something silly like "they should just ban combustion altogether." An ridiculously untenable statement like that is easily destroyed. That is when you start getting truth. They will tell you that the benefit of mankind is not their interest and therefore their argument stands.
"But millions would die of disease and starvation," is a common response to an eco-nut statement. The misanthrope will invariably respond with: "good. Mankind is a blight and a scourge on the earth and there are too many of us to begin with."
Bang. Eco-fascist. Think about what they actually mean by that. This is the goal and moral underpinning of the misanthropic eco-nut. They won't be committing suicide as a member of the human race because they have a dual purpose:
Misanthropes are antagonistic to the human race. They are everyone's enemy including themselves. They are the enemy of all of your ancestors, all of the descendants of your ancestors, and all of your descendants yet to be born.
There can be no greater cause than the defence of mankind. There is no moral authority higher than the safety and benefit of mankind. The continued existence of the human species negates any other considerations. Mankind's dominance over nature must be upheld by all means we possess else we cannot guarantee our species imperative: to exist.
The only way to accept a misanthropic viewpoint into society would be for the misanthropes to sterilize themselves. What followers they convert can also choose to voluntarily become sterile. No one can be involuntarily sterilized or killed to reduce the population.
People think that evolution has stopped. Instead of evolving better eyes because only people with perfect eyes are left to reproduce, we simply make eye glasses. Everyone survives thanks to our industrial society. Hooray!
Evolution doesn't stop in times of plenty. It begins to experiment with all kinds of plentiful variations. Some dance and sing. Others unlock the secrets of the universe. Each individual is a unique expression of the human genome. Each one may hold the key to survival when or if the times of plenty come to an end. Whatever variation of human makes it through the next bottleneck becomes the new human archetype.
Look at David "Dr. Fruit fly" Suzuki talk about overpopulation here (yes those are really his hands).
Videos like that are how progressives become misanthropes. What is a progressive but a paternalistic self-appointed manager of society.
Presented with the false problem Suzuki gives, progressives and environmentalists take it upon themselves to be the next bottleneck. A bottleneck is a calamity for a species. They see it as inevitable and so what else is there for them to do but manage and enforce a decline.
Even if they succeed its totally irresposible to purposefully reduce the population. Nobody knows what the next real bottleneck is. If we end up with nothing but metrosexuals can we be sure humanity will survive the next challenge at all?
It's hard to say whether our current downward trajectory is the result of purposeful social engineering taken by progressives to reduce the population and its attendant economy. It would be nice if Suzuki and people like him would stop thinking about humans as if they were maggots or bacteria. Do progressives have a hand in making kids more trouble than they are worth to a lot of people? I think they do.
Either way they hate humanity. Excommunicated Greenpeace Founder and Doctor of Ecology Patrick Moore coined the the phrase "Anti-human" to describe misanthropy in environmentalism. I conclude with a clip of Dr. Moore explaining anti-human environmentalism. Its real and its working against your own life.
Try that word out. Its here. Its inside the environmental movement and its dangerous to our health.
Last weekend the misanthropic eco-nut cult held a Blackout Rally in Washington. Only 5,000 people showed up. One of them was honest enough to speak his mind to the Light Brigade.
This man wants blackouts. He wants to get rid of all the roads and all the cars because he thinks they are an existential threat to the planet. The planet and our civilization cannot co-exist in the minds of many environmentalists.
Not all of them are like that. The groupies who haven't really thought it through are in there too. A great many have picked up the misanthropic ques from the leaders and are actively against the human race.
The guy in the video above is not some freak that just showed up. He is typical. I've met people like him and debated them.
Usually it starts when someone you just met says something silly like "they should just ban combustion altogether." An ridiculously untenable statement like that is easily destroyed. That is when you start getting truth. They will tell you that the benefit of mankind is not their interest and therefore their argument stands.
"But millions would die of disease and starvation," is a common response to an eco-nut statement. The misanthrope will invariably respond with: "good. Mankind is a blight and a scourge on the earth and there are too many of us to begin with."
Bang. Eco-fascist. Think about what they actually mean by that. This is the goal and moral underpinning of the misanthropic eco-nut. They won't be committing suicide as a member of the human race because they have a dual purpose:
- spread misanthropy and
- end the human species.
Misanthropes are antagonistic to the human race. They are everyone's enemy including themselves. They are the enemy of all of your ancestors, all of the descendants of your ancestors, and all of your descendants yet to be born.
There can be no greater cause than the defence of mankind. There is no moral authority higher than the safety and benefit of mankind. The continued existence of the human species negates any other considerations. Mankind's dominance over nature must be upheld by all means we possess else we cannot guarantee our species imperative: to exist.
The only way to accept a misanthropic viewpoint into society would be for the misanthropes to sterilize themselves. What followers they convert can also choose to voluntarily become sterile. No one can be involuntarily sterilized or killed to reduce the population.
People think that evolution has stopped. Instead of evolving better eyes because only people with perfect eyes are left to reproduce, we simply make eye glasses. Everyone survives thanks to our industrial society. Hooray!
Evolution doesn't stop in times of plenty. It begins to experiment with all kinds of plentiful variations. Some dance and sing. Others unlock the secrets of the universe. Each individual is a unique expression of the human genome. Each one may hold the key to survival when or if the times of plenty come to an end. Whatever variation of human makes it through the next bottleneck becomes the new human archetype.
Look at David "Dr. Fruit fly" Suzuki talk about overpopulation here (yes those are really his hands).
Videos like that are how progressives become misanthropes. What is a progressive but a paternalistic self-appointed manager of society.
Presented with the false problem Suzuki gives, progressives and environmentalists take it upon themselves to be the next bottleneck. A bottleneck is a calamity for a species. They see it as inevitable and so what else is there for them to do but manage and enforce a decline.
Even if they succeed its totally irresposible to purposefully reduce the population. Nobody knows what the next real bottleneck is. If we end up with nothing but metrosexuals can we be sure humanity will survive the next challenge at all?
It's hard to say whether our current downward trajectory is the result of purposeful social engineering taken by progressives to reduce the population and its attendant economy. It would be nice if Suzuki and people like him would stop thinking about humans as if they were maggots or bacteria. Do progressives have a hand in making kids more trouble than they are worth to a lot of people? I think they do.
Either way they hate humanity. Excommunicated Greenpeace Founder and Doctor of Ecology Patrick Moore coined the the phrase "Anti-human" to describe misanthropy in environmentalism. I conclude with a clip of Dr. Moore explaining anti-human environmentalism. Its real and its working against your own life.
Monday, February 4, 2013
America, your decline is showing.
You would expect that the biggest night of the year in sports would include full power to the lighting system. A power outage 34 minutes long occured in the second half of the XLVII Superbowl yesterday.
It used to be that only female clothing accidentally goes off at a Superbowl. This however is Obama's America.
In Obama's America they can't even keep the lights on. Entergy is the company that provided power to the Superbowl until they didn't. They boast about catching farts for the planet specifically for the Superbowl on thier website.
When you dig deeper you find out that they are funding a faraway farm to literally burn bullcrap for electrcity. Somehow this "offsets your carbon footprint" for a Superbowl free of eco-guilt. What a steaming load of bull. What kind of crap morality requires that a person burn poop as they burn fuel?
What use is a power company that spends its resources providing free electricty to some farmer while paying customers sit in the dark? This is the decline.
So what is next for the fart catchers? What else can they diminish besides the Superbowl?
The Eco-nuts are planning a "Blackout Rally" on February 17th in Washington. The Sierra Club and 350.org are a few of the organizations that will be there asking for increased general poverty. These fanatics have openly called for large scale reductions (95%) in nuclear, hydroelectric, and fossil fuel consummption with no viable replacement.
Power outages would be common place if these organizations ever succeeded. Power outages would be the default while things like Superbowls would just fade away. Who would buy the products in those expensive commercials? Who could afford to run a television? How would they even light up the Stadium?
These eco-nuts are anti-civilization, anti-life, and anti-mind. They are anti-human. They must be opposed. Some fearless and intelligent people are doing just that. Alex Epstien will be there with a counter movement. He's calling it The Light Brigade. Thanks to people like him, I actually look forward to these events.
 |
| Superbowl XLVII |
In Obama's America they can't even keep the lights on. Entergy is the company that provided power to the Superbowl until they didn't. They boast about catching farts for the planet specifically for the Superbowl on thier website.
 |
| SPQR |
What use is a power company that spends its resources providing free electricty to some farmer while paying customers sit in the dark? This is the decline.
So what is next for the fart catchers? What else can they diminish besides the Superbowl?
The Eco-nuts are planning a "Blackout Rally" on February 17th in Washington. The Sierra Club and 350.org are a few of the organizations that will be there asking for increased general poverty. These fanatics have openly called for large scale reductions (95%) in nuclear, hydroelectric, and fossil fuel consummption with no viable replacement.
Power outages would be common place if these organizations ever succeeded. Power outages would be the default while things like Superbowls would just fade away. Who would buy the products in those expensive commercials? Who could afford to run a television? How would they even light up the Stadium?
These eco-nuts are anti-civilization, anti-life, and anti-mind. They are anti-human. They must be opposed. Some fearless and intelligent people are doing just that. Alex Epstien will be there with a counter movement. He's calling it The Light Brigade. Thanks to people like him, I actually look forward to these events.
Friday, April 27, 2012
Alison's Solyndra begins to collapse
Over in Ontario so called "progressive" policies have led to credit downgrades exactly as predicted.
Here in Alberta, the eco-boondoggle known as Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) lost a major player. TransAlta corp has pulled out of the $1.4 billion Pioneer Project because it wasn't economically feasible.
The Minister of eco-nuttery (or Environment) Dianna McQueen says:
The Minister predictably maintains that the other 3 projects are economically viable. This must refer to a progressive definition of economically viable. Projects subsidized in the tens of millions are normally thought of as economically infeasible.
Even with the heavy subsidies, companies use the CO2 from CCS to stimulate old wells to produce more oil. Money is made producing oil alone. CO2 has no value. Its smoke.
TransAlta blames the inherent worthlessness of CO2 for the project's cancellation. Government price controls on a worthless and ubiquitous substance like CO2 have failed everywhere they have been tried. Al Gore's Carbon Exchange in Chicago was dreamed up by Enron and is now history like Enron. European Carbon Exchange is rife with fraud and even the eco-nuts don't like it.
Don't ever say oil companies oppose cap and trade. They don't. Essentially, the government pays them gigantic sums of money to extract more oil. What a deal. You pay for it all.
The best part is that all of this is happening under the premise that its supposed to make you feel good. Its the 'Do-Something' rationalization. CCS has negligible impact on Climate Change according to the most alarmist Climate theories. The PC government has committed $2 billion to do nothing at all. $2 billion will make a lot of CO2 however its spent. CCS does less than nothing at all for the Climate in theory and don't forget that It's only profitable if they can sell more oil doing it. Stupid. This is probably the most expensive way to produce oil possible.
"But we have to do something."
Why? Why do we have to do something? I am all for efficiency. I despise waste. The 'Do-Somthing' rationale is a total waste. It doesn't affect global warming and it makes nobody happy. I'm not happy and the eco-nuts are never happy. Welcome to Alison's Wonderland Alberta.
Update: Minister McQueen says that no taxpayer money has been spent on CCS yet. Hopefully the rest will pull out before the government can waste it.
Here in Alberta, the eco-boondoggle known as Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) lost a major player. TransAlta corp has pulled out of the $1.4 billion Pioneer Project because it wasn't economically feasible.
The Minister of eco-nuttery (or Environment) Dianna McQueen says:
“Under new technology, sometimes this happens ... "That so happens to be the same excuse Obama used to explain the Solyndra failure. Excuses appear daily as "green" endeavors fail.
The Minister predictably maintains that the other 3 projects are economically viable. This must refer to a progressive definition of economically viable. Projects subsidized in the tens of millions are normally thought of as economically infeasible.
Even with the heavy subsidies, companies use the CO2 from CCS to stimulate old wells to produce more oil. Money is made producing oil alone. CO2 has no value. Its smoke.
TransAlta blames the inherent worthlessness of CO2 for the project's cancellation. Government price controls on a worthless and ubiquitous substance like CO2 have failed everywhere they have been tried. Al Gore's Carbon Exchange in Chicago was dreamed up by Enron and is now history like Enron. European Carbon Exchange is rife with fraud and even the eco-nuts don't like it.
Don't ever say oil companies oppose cap and trade. They don't. Essentially, the government pays them gigantic sums of money to extract more oil. What a deal. You pay for it all.
The best part is that all of this is happening under the premise that its supposed to make you feel good. Its the 'Do-Something' rationalization. CCS has negligible impact on Climate Change according to the most alarmist Climate theories. The PC government has committed $2 billion to do nothing at all. $2 billion will make a lot of CO2 however its spent. CCS does less than nothing at all for the Climate in theory and don't forget that It's only profitable if they can sell more oil doing it. Stupid. This is probably the most expensive way to produce oil possible.
"But we have to do something."
Why? Why do we have to do something? I am all for efficiency. I despise waste. The 'Do-Somthing' rationale is a total waste. It doesn't affect global warming and it makes nobody happy. I'm not happy and the eco-nuts are never happy. Welcome to Alison's Wonderland Alberta.
Update: Minister McQueen says that no taxpayer money has been spent on CCS yet. Hopefully the rest will pull out before the government can waste it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)